Each spring The Lawyer publishes its annual ranking of the top 30 international firms in the UK, a list dominated by the largest US firms in the City.
Last week Mayer Brown became the first US office to report its London figures for 2010. In 2009 the firm came fourth on London revenue with $146.3m (£90m)following a 16 per cent drop in fee income. However, the full-service nature of the firm’s London office dragged it down to fourth from the bottom on revenue per lawyer, with $530,000.
When the top 30 table is printed later this year, the US firm can be confident that at least its total revenue in London has travelled in the right direction. Last year the firm broke through the £100m barrier for the first time since 2008, with a 10 per cent rise in revenue to £102m.
The results will be taken internally as confirmation that ending merger talks with Simmons & Simmons was the correct decision. Certainly, according to London senior partner Sean Connolly, any tie-up with another UK firm is not on the agenda.
“We did a review post-Simmons and concluded that there was no one out there that was a legitimate merger partner,” said Connolly. “Therefore we’re going to grow organically and laterally.”
Last Monday (31 January), some of that growth was marked in style. At a celebratory dinner, global real estate head Jeremy Clay raised his glass to the highest number of new equity partners (six) since the 2002 merger of Mayer Brown and Rowe & Maw.
The firm’s investment in the City mirrors last year’s promotion of six income (salaried) partners in London. Clay said the investment reflects the increasingly pivotal role of London in Mayer Brown’s international network.
“Of the firm’s top 20 biggest clients, 14 do business in London, generating fees ranging from around $50,000 to $3m,” Clay said. ”Seeing as this started at zero in 2002 and we had the global recession to weather, we think it’s a good result.”
The London office’s performance contrasts with Mayer Brown’s firmwide results, which saw both total turnover and average profit per equity partner (PEP) effectively remain flat. Total revenue in 2010 stood at $1.11bn, while PEP rose by 1 per cent to reach $1.07m.
Readers' comments (5)
Anonymous | 8-Feb-2011 12:26 pm
If the firm's doing so well why have so many London Partners left? Clay's point is tenuous given that well over six partners have left the firm in the last 2 years.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
jerry | 8-Feb-2011 4:17 pm
Simmons was definitely not a legitimate merger partner for Mayer Brown.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 9-Feb-2011 10:21 am
You can't blame MB for trying to repair the negative PR that they have had over the past two years. However, for every statistic published, there will be another unpublished one which puts it into perspective. The number of equity partner promotions v departures is one. The number of assistants who have left the firm in the past two years is another. Likewise the number of clients that have walked during that period.
The positive is that they appear to have arrested the slide, but that's about as far as it goes.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 28-Feb-2011 3:39 pm
Clay says “Of the firm’s top 20 biggest clients, 14 do business in London, generating fees ranging from around $50,000 to $3m,” .... sounds like playing around with numbers has gone wrong .... a firm where one of the top 20 biggest clients only generate $50,000 is nothing to brag about
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 28-Feb-2011 3:46 pm
Agree with Anonymous 8 Feb @12:26. This article seems to be deliberately placed desperate attempt by MB to counteract bad publicity. What about departure of the 2 Finance senior partners Jacky Evans, Lee Cullinane bringing an end to the Lev Fin practice only started a year before; departure of FSRE Partner Nick Kynoch which means no FSRE capability globally following US Partner FSRE departures; and many others. There's nothing "pivotal" about the role of the London office ... just trying to stop the slide ....
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment