The Lawyer Africa Elite 2014 features an in-depth look at 46 leading independent firms’ strategies in 15 key sub-Saharan jurisdictions, as well as the views of in-house counsel from some of Africa’s largest companies... Read more
This year, The Lawyer’s annual ranking of the largest UK law firms by turnover is available as an interactive, digital benchmarking tool. For the first time this will allow you to manipulate each data set against the metrics of your choice.
Manches has failed in an attempt to recover £570,000 of unpaid fees from the chief executive of bankrupt video games company Gizmondo.
This morning (Thursday 30 November) Judge Philip Price QC, sitting as a deputy High Court judge, ruled that there had been no guarantee made between Carl Freer and Manches over payment of the fees.
As reported by The Lawyer (17 April 2006) the claim was launched by Manches after Gizmondo, formerly owned by Tiger Telematics, went into liquidation in February this year.
The claim said that Freer was personally liable for the fees owed to Manches by Gizmondo. Manches said that when Freer signed the engagement letter with the firm on behalf of Gizmondo he entered into a guarantee.
However Judge Price QC disagreed, finding that there was no guarantee.
Hal Branch, a litigation partner at West End private client boutique Lass Salt Garvin acting for Freer, said: “Mr Freer did not intend to bind himself to the payment of sums owing by the companies to Manches.”
Branch instructed Hardwicke Buildings’ Peter Kirby for Freer.
Manches’ litigation partner Clive Zietman instructed Four New Square’s Justin Fenwick QC. Zietman declined to comment.