Partners to scrutinise fine print of deal ahead of key merger vote
Top-performing partners at Lovells are anticipating the prospect of pocketing a massive payout within a year of the firm’s merger with Hogan & Hartson as the partnership prepares to discuss the minutiae of the deal at its annual conference this week.
Partners at both firms were issued with merger papers earlier this month and are being asked to okay plans based on the fact that Hogan Lovells’ corporate governance structure will be modelled broadly on Lovells’, while its pay structure will mirror Hogan’s.
As such Lovells partners will for the first time be eligible for a performance-linked bonus.
Under Hogan’s merit-based equity structure 85 per cent of a partner’s remuneration is linked to points that accumulate from the point of making equity partner, while the remainder comes from a bonus pool set aside to reward exceptional performance. The points-linked element, based on areas including billings, client development, pro bono and firm-mindedness, is reviewed biennially, while the bonus is calculated at the end of each financial year.
When the merger goes ahead on 1 May 2010 Lovells partners’ lockstep points will be translated into merit-based points, taking account of lockstep progression. To ensure partners are placed at the right level it will take two years to be fully integrated onto the system, although bonuses will be paid at the end of 2010-11.
The new firm will follow Lovells’ model of having an international executive that handles business development and a partnership council that deals with issues such as partner remuneration and lateral hires.
Lovells managing partner David Harris and Hogan chairman Warren Gorrell will be joint CEOs of the new firm until 2014, when the dual role will be reviewed.
Lovells senior partner John Young will serve as joint chairman of the new firm alongside a Hogan partner to be chosen by the US firm ahead of the merger.
In the US Lovells partners will move onto Hogan’s LLP, which will be rebranded, while in Europe the opposite will happen. Discussions are ongoing about how to proceed in Asia.
Voting on the merger will open following Lovells’ partnership conference, with the result expected in early December.
Lovells declined to comment on the details of the merger, but said in a statement: “We’ve previously said that we feel there’s a strong business rationale for merger, but we’re committed to having discussions about the future of our firm among our partners.”
Readers' comments (10)
mary | 16-Nov-2009 12:05 pm
Surely nobody will vote against this? Looks like a pretty well considered deal....
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Dirt | 16-Nov-2009 1:18 pm
there'll be some opposition from the lazier partners who've done well out of modified lockstep and don't want to lose out. but i think they're (now) a smallish minority.
tell you want: bet harald seisler wishes he hadn't stormed out now.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 16-Nov-2009 3:55 pm
Hogan. Will. Eat. Lovells. Alive. End of.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 16-Nov-2009 4:14 pm
Harald didn't storm out, he was kicked out by Young and Harris for standing up to London and trying to kick the lazy London based partners up the back side.
The merger is good as Hogan seems to be a much better managed outfit.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 16-Nov-2009 5:23 pm
Hogan are gonna be a breath of fresh air to the old farts at Lovells!
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 17-Nov-2009 10:31 am
Don't bet against the culture of mediocrity at Lovells being able to wreck the deal - the thought of having to work for one's crust will scare a lot of the partners. I doubt that there will be many partners who will merit windfalls - the hard workers have largely left already.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Britomart | 17-Nov-2009 10:49 am
There are plenty of hard workers still left at Lovells- It's the rainmakers who have gone!
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 17-Nov-2009 2:38 pm
"Culture of mediocrity". Lovells? Surely not.
[Wry smile.]
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 19-Nov-2009 2:58 pm
In relation to the comment above:
If. Hogan. Eats. Lovells. Alive.
It. Will. End. Up. With. A. Severe. Case. Of. Flatulence.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
zimlawyer | 20-Nov-2009 5:41 pm
tsk tsk tsk hogan..... of all City firms, Lovells?
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment