The Lawyer Asia Pacific 150 is the only research report to provide a ranking of the top 100 independent local firms and top 50 global firms in the region. The report offers critical review of some of the fastest growing firms and their strategies, a country-by-country guide to leading legal advisers and legal services market trends, plus exclusive insight into the current business development opportunities in the Asia Pacific. Read more
This year, The Lawyer’s annual ranking of the largest UK law firms by turnover is available as an interactive, digital benchmarking tool. For the first time this will allow you to manipulate each data set against the metrics of your choice.
Lovells litigation partner Andrew Foyle will be required to give evidence in relation to his client British American Tobacco (BAT) in the $289bn (£165.68bn) case United States of America v Philip Morris & Ors.
Mr Justice Moore-Bick last Wednesday (10 December) ruled that Foyle must give evidence in the case, in which BAT is a co-defendant.
Foyle’s advice in relation to BAT’s document retention previously came under scrutiny in the McCabe v BAT case in Australia.
The Australian courts originally found in favour of lung cancer victim Rolah McCabe, but the decision was overturned by the Court of Appeal. Both the company and its lawyers were completely exonerated.
Last month the Australian High Court ruled that it would not give the McCabe family leave to appeal the decision.
Now Foyle has been asked to provide evidence for the US claim – although the evidence will be heard in the UK. However, this decision does not suggest that Foyle or Lovells had acted improperly. The judgment states that the US has no intention of bringing criminal or civil proceedings against Foyle.
Lovells represented BAT, while the US government was represented by Steven Loble of Loble Solicitors. Norton Rose advised Foyle and Herbert Smith acted for BAT chief executive Martin Broughton, who was not ordered to give evidence.