The Lawyer Asia Pacific 150 is the only research report to provide a ranking of the top 100 independent local firms and top 50 global firms in the region. The report offers critical review of some of the fastest growing firms and their strategies, a country-by-country guide to leading legal advisers and legal services market trends, plus exclusive insight into the current business development opportunities in the Asia Pacific. Read more
This year, The Lawyer’s annual ranking of the largest UK law firms by turnover is available as an interactive, digital benchmarking tool. For the first time this will allow you to manipulate each data set against the metrics of your choice.
IN A landmark judgment the House of Lords has allowed the human rights organisation Liberty to intervene in a case.
This is believed to be the first time written third-party intervention has been allowed in a criminal case before the Lords and could set a precedent for similar interventions.
The appeal concerned evidence obtained by police on bugging devices, which the appellant argued was inadmissible because it constituted a breach of privacy and because there was no legal framework regulating police bugging.
Although they dismissed the appeal, the Lords referred extensively to Liberty's submission on the law of the European Convention on Human Rights.
Lords Slynn and Nolan called for the Government to regulate police bugging. The case will now be considered by the European Commission of Human Rights.
Philip Leach, legal officer at Liberty, said: "Clearly the judges found Liberty's intervention helpful. This case sets a precedent for the rights of third party intervention." John Wadham, director of Liberty, said it demonstrated the need for the European Convention to be incorporated into UK law as there was no domestic right of privacy in the UK.
But this proposition was firmly rejected by the Lord Chancellor last week. Lord Mackay said it would "draw judges into making decisions of a political nature...which is and has been accepted by the judiciary to be properly the preserve of Parliament".