The Lawyer’s new China Elite report contains the most detailed research available on the PRC legal market and contains unparalleled insight into the country's leading law firms. They vary in size, practice focus and geographic coverage, but they all share one common quality – ambition... Read more
This year, The Lawyer’s annual ranking of the largest UK law firms by turnover is available as an interactive, digital benchmarking tool. For the first time this will allow you to manipulate each data set against the metrics of your choice.
For a long time now, anecdotal evidence has hinted at the declining use of London's courts to resolve commercial disputes. But the figures published today in The Lawyer reveal the true extent of that decline.
Industry is increasingly resorting to alternative dispute resolution and mediation, and the one over-riding and fundamental reason for this is the sheer cost of litigating in London's courts.
The knee-jerk reaction is to blame this decline on lawyers in the capital pricing themselves out of business. Fees are clearly high but so too are overheads in the capital.
Regional players are not overburdened by exorbitant rents, huge wage bills and a myriad of other costs. But while perhaps in previous years, provincial firms lacked expertise and the resources to attract blue-chip clients, that is clearly no longer the case.
The legal market is changing. Competition for London can only be a good thing. London still remains the hub for legal activity, but it will have to offer an ever-improving service if it is to maintain its market share while charging the highest fees in the business.