The Lawyer Asia Pacific 150 is the only research report to provide a ranking of the top 100 independent local firms and top 50 global firms in the region. The report offers critical review of some of the fastest growing firms and their strategies, a country-by-country guide to leading legal advisers and legal services market trends, plus exclusive insight into the current business development opportunities in the Asia Pacific. Read more
This year, The Lawyer’s annual ranking of the largest UK law firms by turnover is available as an interactive, digital benchmarking tool. For the first time this will allow you to manipulate each data set against the metrics of your choice.
Local authority employers are unfairly discriminating against barristers when recruiting for senior local government posts, according to the Bar Association for Local Government and the Public Sector.
Mirza Ahmad, association treasurer and head of legal services at Bolton Metro, said some local authorities were blatantly refusing to appoint barristers to certain local government legal jobs.
"There is no sound reason why barristers should not be considered equally with solicitor colleagues for all legal posts in local government," he said.
"My main concern is high-level positions where, traditionally, local authorities seem to be excessively biased towards solicitors. There are some progressive local authorities which do not see it as a hindrance, and part of the problem may be through ignorance."
One possible reason for appointing solicitors rather than barristers is that employed barristers cannot currently be described as "solicitor on record" on the court register. But, said Ahmad, this did not mean they could not do the relevant work.
As a result, he will be asking the Bar Council to register as an authorised body for litigators, which would do away with the problem, and he would like to hear from barristers who have experienced pro-solicitor bias.