The Lawyer Asia Pacific 150 is the only research report to provide a ranking of the top 100 independent local firms and top 50 global firms in the region. The report offers critical review of some of the fastest growing firms and their strategies, a country-by-country guide to leading legal advisers and legal services market trends, plus exclusive insight into the current business development opportunities in the Asia Pacific. Read more
This year, The Lawyer’s annual ranking of the largest UK law firms by turnover is available as an interactive, digital benchmarking tool. For the first time this will allow you to manipulate each data set against the metrics of your choice.
LLOYD'S is to continue pursuing its member Names to cover its losses, despite this month's Court of Appeal ruling in the cases of Names Clementson and Mason.
Names pressure group the Writs Response Group (WRG) saw a significant victory in the court decision that it could use the defence that Lloyd's central fund was in breach of Article 85 of the Treaty of Rome.
But now Lloyd's has confirmed that it can and will continue to draw on the members' funds, if and when required.
Richard Slowe, of SJ Berwin & Co which acts for the Writs Response Group, said: "As the Walker committee has already found that the central fund does indeed distort competition, I have every confidence that the Commercial Court will reach the same conclusion and declare void the arrangements for the operation of the central fund."
Commenting on the significance of the ruling for Lloyd's Names, David Tiplady, a partner of DJ Freeman which is handling Lloyd's matters, says: "This decision merely delays matters and does not resolve them. It was always assumed that these issues, in particular the liability of the Names for losses, would go to trial. Indeed, that is what the Court of Appeal has said.
"Even if the Article 85 defence succeeds, that may not release the Names from their liabilities. The decision has basically changed the lights for the case from red to amber."