The Lawyer’s new China Elite report contains the most detailed research available on the PRC legal market and contains unparalleled insight into the country's leading law firms. They vary in size, practice focus and geographic coverage, but they all share one common quality – ambition... Read more
This year, The Lawyer’s annual ranking of the largest UK law firms by turnover is available as an interactive, digital benchmarking tool. For the first time this will allow you to manipulate each data set against the metrics of your choice.
R v Islington London Borough Council, ex parte Jonathan Rixon (by his mother and next friend Stephanie Rixon) (1996).
QBD (Sedley J).
Summary: Application for judicial review of a local authority's duties towards chronically disabled person.
Application on behalf of a severely disabled male person who is now 25 and is blind, microcephalic, practically immobile, doubly incontinent and largely unable to communicate for judicial review of the alleged failures by the respondent local authority to make the necessary provision for the applicant's social, recreational and educational needs. The applicant suffers from severe deformities of the chest and spine, a hiatus hernia and permanent digestive disorder, is the size and weight of a small child and is helpless, being totally dependent on the care of his mother and others.