The Lawyer’s newest product is the most comprehensive overview of the Asia-Pacific legal market yet produced. With rankings of the top 100 local law firms by lawyer headcount as well as analysis of the leading 50 international players in the region, it is essential reading for anyone interested in the strategic future of the world’s fastest growing legal market
Where liability is admitted but quantum is in dispute
Peter Limb (Appellant) v (1) Union Jack Removals (in liquidation) (2) Jack Robert Honess (Respondents): McGivern v Brown: Partington v Turners Bakery: Pyne Edwards v Moore Large & Co: Smith v Brothers of Charity Services: Tomkins v Griffiths (1998)
Court: CA (Brooke LJ, Mummery LJ and Sir John Balcombe) 10/2/98
Summary: CCR order 9 r10 does not apply where the defendant does not admit both liability and the whole of the plaintiff's money claim. Defendants who make no admissions as to quantum must use alternative steps under the rules to end proceedings before trial.