The Lawyer’s new China Elite report contains the most detailed research available on the PRC legal market and contains unparalleled insight into the country's leading law firms. They vary in size, practice focus and geographic coverage, but they all share one common quality – ambition... Read more
This year, The Lawyer’s annual ranking of the largest UK law firms by turnover is available as an interactive, digital benchmarking tool. For the first time this will allow you to manipulate each data set against the metrics of your choice.
Duty owed by a local authority to a child in its care
Barrett v London Borough of Enfield (1997)
Court: CA (Lord Woolf MR, Evans LJ and Schiemann LJ) 25/3/9Appearances: Allan Levy, instructed by Thompson Smith & Puxon, for the appellant. Nigel Baker QC and Brendan Roche, instructed by Browne Jacobson, for the local authority.
Summary: Striking out a claim by a person formerly in care against the local authority on the grounds of negligence at common law while he was in care.
Plaintiff's appeal against order striking out his claim for damages for personal injury sustained while he was a minor in the care of the defendant local authority. The plaintiff was 10 when a care order was made and he remained in care until he was nearly 18. While in care he was moved on nine different occasions between placements. Allegations of any breach of statutory duty in the pleadings had been abandoned and the plaintiff rested his case solely on alleged breaches of the common law duty of care.