The Lawyer Asia Pacific 150 is the only research report to provide a ranking of the top 100 independent local firms and top 50 global firms in the region. The report offers critical review of some of the fastest growing firms and their strategies, a country-by-country guide to leading legal advisers and legal services market trends, plus exclusive insight into the current business development opportunities in the Asia Pacific. Read more
This year, The Lawyer’s annual ranking of the largest UK law firms by turnover is available as an interactive, digital benchmarking tool. For the first time this will allow you to manipulate each data set against the metrics of your choice.
Reviewing Lord Chancellor's appointment of a judge
R v Lord Chancellor, ex parte Maxwell (1996).
DC (Henry LJ and Sachs J) 19/6/96.
Summary: Challenging by judicial review the Lord Chancellor's refusal to request the trial judge who had presided over the trial of earlier counts in a severed indictment to preside over the trial of the remaining counts in the Crown Court notwithstanding that judge's elevation as a Lord Justice of Appeal.
Application for judicial review of the Lord Chancellor's decision not to request, under s.9 Supreme Court Act 1981, Lord Justice Phillips to act as a judge of the Crown Court for the purpose of presiding over the disposal of the remaining stages of the criminal case against the applicant and others under Indictment No.T 930798. The applicant contended that as the case was "part heard" under s.7 (1) Criminal Justice Act 1987 and that having ordered a preparatory hearing in relation to the trial of the indictment, the judge was thereafter bound to preside over the trial of all counts on that indictment in the absence of exceptional circumstances such as ill-health.