The Lawyer Asia Pacific 150 is the only research report to provide a ranking of the top 100 independent local firms and top 50 global firms in the region. The report offers critical review of some of the fastest growing firms and their strategies, a country-by-country guide to leading legal advisers and legal services market trends, plus exclusive insight into the current business development opportunities in the Asia Pacific. Read more
This year, The Lawyer’s annual ranking of the largest UK law firms by turnover is available as an interactive, digital benchmarking tool. For the first time this will allow you to manipulate each data set against the metrics of your choice.
Summary: Whether or not the sale of own-brand items directly targeted at a market leader and packaged and marketed in a similar way amounts to passing off and an infringement of trade marks.
The plaintiff, a major biscuit manufacturer, sought injunctive relief and damages for passing off and trade mark infringement against the defendant, a national supermarket chain. The plaintiff's product was a chocolate biscuit known as a Penguin and the biscuit launched by the defendant in competition was given the name Puffin. The defendant counter-claimed for revocation of the plaintiff's trade marks under s.46(1)(b) of the Trade Marks Act 1994. The two products compared were said to be of the same size and shape and to have used comparable, though not identical, materials in the packaging, but in the opinion of the judge this did not have a striking impact.