Employee loses bid for slice of employer’s profits but patent case clarifies employment case hurdles
Mark Stephens says the High Court dismissal of the Miranda judicial review represents a sad day for democracy
Referral fees are banned. The Bar Council’s new code of conduct explicitly states that barristers must not “pay or receive referral fees”, and additionally “making or receiving payments in order to procure or reward the referral…may also breach public trust.”
Litigants have a newfound impetus for pushing the boundaries of law, particularly when it comes to costs. A recent DLA Piper case suggests lawyers could be in the firing line.
When is Greek yoghurt Greek yoghurt? Should a Kit Kat be trademark protected? It was all up for debate in the courts in January.
The Defamation Act came into force at the beginning of the year. Here Hardeep Singh asks two individuals who defended claims under the previous regime if anything has changed and what they might do differently.
Supreme Court hears: DPP policy on assisted suicide isolates patients and has “chilling effect” on doctors
The Lawyer’s annual report into the top 50 firms for global litigation is eagerly awaited by those with ambitions to grow their contentious business.
We look at cases that have reached the end of the judicial line after being refused permission to carry on to the Supreme Court.
Getting a judicial review claim into court is no mean feat, as lawyer Alex Monaco found when he tried to challenge Vince Cable MP
LSLA president Francesca Kaye on the landmark costs battle being fought by Andrew Mitchell MP in a case that is set to define the Jackson reforms
Can the in-house advocacy unit at Berwin Leighton Paisner really compete with the independent commercial bar?
There are good reasons that claimants in the Cyprus properties row should litigate on the island, not in the UK
CMS insurance head Stephen Netherway says litigation funders can lawfully withdraw funding from cases thanks to a recent ruling
The longest running case of 2012 came to an end yesterday, but there are still plenty of questions to be asked of the claimant Excalibur and its lawyers
Costs budgeting in libel cases is being tested
Never mind the secrecy demands of the rich and famous, keep the barriers to open justice high
Mayer Brown partner Sarah Byrt discusses Rihanna’s passing off case against Topshop…
After a considerable amount of work, the Government has finally introduced new rules for employment tribunals this week.
The Jackson reforms are coming under scrutiny by the courts.
Legal Services Board does not want the ‘cab rank’ rule abolished, but to understand its limitations
11KBW silks Clive Lewis QC and Nigel Giffin QC defeat judicial review bid argued by set-mate Clive Sheldon QC.
The former Ince & Co partner jailed yesterday for defrauding the firm attempted to obtain an OBE by faking letters hailing him as a cancer charity hero, it has emerged.
Lawyers for the Hillsborough victims’ families will lobby for a top prosecutor to work on the new police inquiry into the 1989 disaster.
Kari Hansen takes a look at dual vicarious liability in light of the Supreme Court’s ruling in the Catholic Child Welfare Society case
It seems that David Cameron is a firm believer in the old adage that no government ever lost votes by attacking the legal profession. After LASPO’s cuts to legal aid provision, the coalition is now gunning for judicial reviews (JR).
The recent decision by the court in the claim brought by Guardian Care Homes against Barclays (see story 30 October 2012), allowing the claimant to bring the manipulation of LIBOR into a case on hedge mis-selling, highlights the storm clouds that still gather around the banking sector and may indicate a lack of trust of banks in the Courts.
As was reported last week (24 October 2012), the Supreme Court has handed down its much anticipated judgment in Rubin v Eurofinance (see judgment here).
The Commercial Court has struck out a claim as an abuse of process, because the central issues had previously been decided against the claimant in an arbitration.
The fact that litigation will be resolved by the court system irrespective of what is happening to asset prices in the wider economy makes third-party litigation funding an attractive option, says Claire Madden