Linklaters handed £2.2m profit share to highest-earning partner in 2010-11

  • Print
  • Comments (25)

Readers' comments (25)

  • meanwhile, there's public sector strike, over a million people are unemployed and everyone else in the legal industry is suffering... All i can say is it's a crazy world!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Do these figures represent the total earnings of this partner? Am I correct to assume that the chap would have been paid bonuses and other benefits on top? If I am correct, how much is he actually taking home in total? Thanks

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Bonus on equity profits? Not sure that's how it usually works Bobby!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Thouroughly well deserved. There should be even bigger cuts in public spending so that people like this can pay lower taxes and take an even bigger share of national wealth, they deserve everything they get unlike the feckless scum working in schools and hospitals.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Not only are there no bonuses on equity profits, the need to keep capital in the business, usually means that partners can't take out all the profit. If banks put the squeeze on, then drawings are often massively reduced to reduce borrowings.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • We often tend to forget that wealth creation is done by those at the top and not at the bottom of the social ladder. After paying the highest rate of tax to the exchequer and spending a lot of the money in British businesses, I should imagine that society had benefitted rather well. Why is there such a perception that those earning more is not contributing to society?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Thanks for the answers. Just trying to understand how it all works. Would he not get client introduction bonus or something like that? I have only just started and am trying to understand what the max earning potential is.... merci

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • We often tend to forget that wealth creation is done by those at the top and not at the bottom of the social ladder.
    ====================
    Yes you are so right, salaries and wealth in our society reflect the amount of wealth 'created' by someone.
    A TV newsreader earning £500k creates far more wealth than someone working in R&D at Rolls Royce on £50k. A partner in a law firm helping private equity companies to acquire and asset strip businesses, or helping hedge funds to speculate, creates far more wealth than a worker in a car factory.
    Only the truly stupid or truly self-interested could believe such garbage. Go to the countries of the future, such as South Korea, China and Japan, and you will see that the attitude there is totally different. Real wealth is created through industry and technology and the development of national infrastructure, not by lawyers.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • 'took home' is a little misleading given the hefty tax burden in the UK. Let's up and move to HK where your money goes further and taxes re less.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Partners in big law take home millions, less than one is rare, a couple of millions is common and there are a bunch of them on 3 or more. Yet, they earn a fraction of what people of similar seniority earn in the banking and corporate world, actually, lawyers are the poor cousins in the City. If you are after money, you'd better change career. It is easy to judge from the outside, being a lawyer is a tough life, almost like being a doctor, your family life goes down the drain, you don't do this job for the money.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Wealth in China is created through industry. No doubt about that.
    And just how much do they pay those who do the work?
    Pleeeeze. Save me the Milton Friedmanesque plea for capitalism.
    Simple fact in life is that ownership of any business brings rewards because ownership carries risks. I know. I have had those sleepless nights. I can even remember once an associate telling me that associates should get part of the profits - but would they sign up their houses to the bank under the personal guarantees for borrowing by the firm? No way.
    Take no risks, draw a salary, whine and moan. The lot of the working classes.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • If this guy had earned the same bugs as his fellow plateau partners, wouldn't this be enough to run a comfortable life? I would fee ashamed towards my fellow partners.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Ah yes, China - Anon - what a wonderful country. No democracy, virtually no human rights, no health and safety (do you know how many Chinese miners are killed every year?).
    It sounds great - why don't you go and try it so the rest of us can get on with our jobs?
    Linklaters is not taking money from the state to pay this guy. They're not robbing your family to pay this guy. He's getting paid for bringing in new clients who themselves are almost certainly from the private sector. Yes, it's a lot of money, but money in and of itself is not something intrinsically evil. If you disagree, please go and give all of your money to the nearest homeless person and go and live in a forest. Oh no, of course, the amount that YOU earn is just right. It's people who earn slightly more than you who are the evil ones.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Greed knows no boundries... no wonder the lefty 60-ies and 70-ies generation that is in power now celebrated the likes of castro, khadaffie, mao and other greedy tryants. There are as greedy and ruthless.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Not in it for the money and I am well aware of the demands of a city career. I have seen many of these articles and I think that they need more context to be relevant to those of us who are not in the loop. No need to lecture me but thank you anyway anon.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Typical left wingers; always after other people's hard earned money.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • A firm like Linklaters is lock step meaning every partner has a certain number of points based on seniority. Points increase each year to a plateau (after ten years I believe at Linklaters). No partner actually gets his lock step portion because of additional equity contributitons and other accounting adjustments. A retiring partner will receive more than his profit share based on Linklaters the applicable retirement criteria.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Quote:
    "Partners in big law take home millions, less than one is rare, a couple of millions is common and there are a bunch of them on 3 or more. Yet, they earn a fraction of what people of similar seniority earn in the banking and corporate world, actually, lawyers are the poor cousins in the City. If you are after money, you'd better change career. It is easy to judge from the outside, being a lawyer is a tough life, almost like being a doctor, your family life goes down the drain, you don't do this job for the money."
    Might have been the case once upon a time but with 60%+ stock deferrals, FSA remuneration codes with clawbacks etc it isnt the case anymore. Other than the hedgies, there will be nobody in the banking world in the UK getting anywhere close to 3m in cash this year.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I'm always interested in the risk - reward argument.
    As I see it the large firms aren't really shouldering any risk. Very rarely do law firms go bust. When they do, it's hell getting money back as a creditor.
    It's strikes me as a self serving argument used by those who have got further up the profits tree.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I have to say, I'm with the ones defending this guy on here. Yes, in the current financial climate, such a public large figure is likely to cause resentment, but there are some mitigating factors that people should consider.
    i.e. Re the 'Public sector', who is it that contributes more? Just think of this guy's tax of 50% and hence what he is actually putting back IN to the economy (roughly £1m?). People that have risen to the top of their field through hard work and brains shouldn't be made villains due to the GOVERNMENT's appalling mismanagement of the economy.
    Also, these firms are LLPs, which goes back to the point that they 'own' the business, hence for this partner to have pulled in that figure suggests that he has MORE than contributed back in (and I suspect well over).
    I'm a hard working corporate associate at Freshfields having got to where I am without any 'doors' opened for me, and frankly seem to work 50 hours a week more than majority of my friends from University. Having worked hard all the way through school, then university and at Freshfields, I certainly don't feel resentful for a high flying partner pulling in this figure.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 per page | 20 per page | 50 per page

Have your say

Mandatory Required Fields

Mandatory

Comments that are in breach or potential breach of our terms and conditions in particular clause 8, may not be published or, if published, may subsequently be taken down. In addition we may remove any comment where a complaint is made in respect of it. These actions are at our sole discretion.

  • Print
  • Comments (25)