Linklaters expected to close gap on Clifford Chance by the year-end
28 November 2005
18 October 2013
30 April 2014
18 October 2013
19 May 2014
21 October 2013
By using the information gathered for the half-year roundup, The Lawyer has estimated full-year figures. The numbers in the table have, in most cases, been provided by the firm's themselves, so give a precise marker as to their performance in the 2005-06 financial year so far.
Clearly an extrapolation of full-year figures is less precise. It is impossible to predict exactly how each of these firms will perform over the next six months: no one can foresee, for example, what trading climate they will be operating in, or account for the variety of billing mechanisms (from the increasingly popular monthly billing to the more traditional pre-end-of-year bulge) now used by firms. However, reasonable estimates based on the results so far make interesting reading.
Clifford Chance heads the list, breaking through the billion-pound barrier, but it is Linklaters' closing of the gap between itself and the global giant that catches the eye. The firm's 16 per cent revenue increase would take it to within touching distance of the billion-pound mark - and Clifford Chance.
However, managing partner Tony Angel admitted that, because of the hugely successful second half Linklaters enjoyed in 2004-2005, maintaining the 16 per cent growth in the same period of this year would be "difficult". Angel added that the firm's strategy of focusing on a "platinum" core group of banking and corporate clients had paid off, with billings up 25 per cent for that group.
Elsewhere, Hammonds drops another three places down the table, Norton Rose, Simmons & Simmons and Ashurst form a trio of City firms separated by £7m, and Pinsent Masons leapfrogs Addleshaw Goddard.
The upturn in the fortunes of many of the largest firms in the legal market is confirmed by figures in The Lawyer's comprehensive roundup of half-year results.
The top 50 firms are averaging 12 per cent growth on last year. Many have exceeded this by some way.
Halliwells, Clyde & Co, Charles Russell, Trowers & Hamlins, Bird & Bird, Taylor Wessing and Holman Fenwick & Willan have all posted a revenue growth of more than 20 per cent on this time last year. Charles Russell, Clydes and Halliwells are the pick of the bunch, each with increases of 25 per cent.
Charles Russell managing partner Grant Howell claimed the increase left the firm on target to improve turnover for 2005-2006 by its budgeted 20 per cent. He did, however, admit that there were no expectations of replicating the same level of growth in the firm's profitability, because of the costs incurred during its launches in Switzerland and Oxford earlier this year.
SJ Berwin also did well, posting a 19 per cent growth. Senior partner David Harrell said this left the firm on track to meet its budget of a 15 per cent increase in turnover to £140m for the 2005-06 financial year.
At the other end of the scale, Denton Wilde Sapte continues to struggle. The firm was the only top-50 outfit to post zero growth in its first six months, with a half-year total of £77m.
|Estimated full-year revenues|
|Estimated rank 2006||Rank 2005||Firm||Estimated full-year total (£m)||2004-2005 revs (£m)||Half-year total (£m)||Half-year % increase|
|4||4||Allen & Overy||749.0||666.0||375.0||12.5|
|8||8||Slaughter and May||305.0||290.0||152.0||5.0|
|11||12||Simmons & Simmons||216.0||196.0||108.0||10.0|
|13||13||CMS Cameron McKenna||171.0||163.1||85.6||5.0|
|=16||14||Denton Wilde Sapte||154.0||154.0||77.0||0.0|
|19||20||Berwin Leighton Paisner||142.0||121.0||70.8||17.0|
|21||21||Clyde & Co||130.0||104.0||65.0||25.0|
|25||28||Bird & Bird||98.1||80.4||40.2||22.0|
|26||27||Wragge & Co||97.4||88.5||46.8||10.0|
|28||29||Barlow Lyde & Gilbert||81.6||80.0||40.0||2.0|
|37||39||Holman Fenwick & Willan||62.4||52.0||31.0||20.0|
|39||38||Field Fisher Waterhouse||59.9||52.1||26.0||15.0|
|43||50||Trowers & Hamlins||54.4||44.2||25.0||23.0|
|44||40||Reynolds Porter Chamberlain||52.8||51.8||25.5||2.0|
|46||45||Ince & Co||50.3||47.0||23.5||7.0|
|47||49||Dundas & Wilson||50.0||44.5||22.2||18.0|
|Salans and McGrigors are not included due to altertnative financal years||Source: The Lawyer|