The Lawyer’s new China Elite report contains the most detailed research available on the PRC legal market and contains unparalleled insight into the country's leading law firms. They vary in size, practice focus and geographic coverage, but they all share one common quality – ambition... Read more
This year, The Lawyer’s annual ranking of the largest UK law firms by turnover is available as an interactive, digital benchmarking tool. For the first time this will allow you to manipulate each data set against the metrics of your choice.
The row over the use of injunctions has prompted a significant jump in the number of privacy cases being pursued in the High Court.
Research by legal information provider Sweet & Maxwell shows that 43 privacy cases were launched in the year to 31 May 2010, compared with 50 between June 2010 and May 2011. Public figures in particular are increasingly using privacy arguments in court actions to protect their right to privacy, more than doubling from nine in 2010 to 24 in the past year.
Anonymity orders - or ’injunctions’- have been put under the spotlight in 2011 with court orders being broken by social platforms such as Twitter. In June, Attorney General Dominic Grieve QC was forced to issue a warning to Twitter followers who break anonymised court orders (7 June 2011).
Among the high-profile figures to get caught up in the row was Manchester United footballer Ryan Giggs, known by the courts as CTB until Liberal Democrat MP John Hemming used parliamentary privilege to reveal his identity (6 June 2011).
The Master of the Rolls Lord Neuberger announced a year long review into the use of injunctions in May (30 May 2011). This followed revelations that former RBS head Fred Goodwin had managed to secure an injunction preventing press reports about an alleged affair (9 June).
Almost half (48 per cent) of the privacy cases launched in the last year were brought by high-profile figures, Sweet & Maxwell said.
Editor Jonathan Cooper said: “There’s growing concern that the UK courts are granting too many injunctions to high-profile individuals to the detriment of free speech.”
He continued: “With the success of these inunctions becoming ever more apparent, a lot of law firms have been advising their clients to cast the terms of an anonymous injunction as widely as possible.”