The Lawyer Asia Pacific 150 is the only research report to provide a ranking of the top 100 independent local firms and top 50 global firms in the region. The report offers critical review of some of the fastest growing firms and their strategies, a country-by-country guide to leading legal advisers and legal services market trends, plus exclusive insight into the current business development opportunities in the Asia Pacific. Read more
This year, The Lawyer’s annual ranking of the largest UK law firms by turnover is available as an interactive, digital benchmarking tool. For the first time this will allow you to manipulate each data set against the metrics of your choice.
Legal & General (L&G) is claiming to have scored a major victory in its high-profile case against the Financial Services Authority (FSA).
The Financial Services and Markets Tribunal today cleared L&G of wide-spread mis-selling of endowments, proving that only eight out of the 152 were mis-sold.
The Tribunal also indicated that the £1.1m fine imposed by the FSA should be reduced and said a further hearing will be held on this issue.
Herbert Smith partner Martyn Hopper, a former senior member of the FSA’s enforcement team said both parties can claim victory.
"The case proved that L&G was justified in feeling aggrieved but the FSA can claim a sufficient victory because they’ve proved mis-selling," added Hopper.
Hopper then added that the case raises questions about the FSA’s methodology in investigating the mis-selling cases and the size of the sample.
The dispute dates back to the late 1990s, when L&G was alleged to have mis-sold endowment mortgages without highlighting the risk that the investment might not repay the capital element of the loan for which it was intended.
L&G was one of several companies fined for similar offences, though this was the only one to challenge the FSA’s sanction.