The Lawyer’s new China Elite report contains the most detailed research available on the PRC legal market and contains unparalleled insight into the country's leading law firms. They vary in size, practice focus and geographic coverage, but they all share one common quality – ambition... Read more
An exhaustive analysis of the UK market including every firm in the top 200 ranked, analysed and benchmarked, UK chambers ranked by turnover, revenue per barrister and which international firms are most active in the UK.
Legal & General (L&G) is claiming to have scored a major victory in its high-profile case against the Financial Services Authority (FSA).
The Financial Services and Markets Tribunal today cleared L&G of wide-spread mis-selling of endowments, proving that only eight out of the 152 were mis-sold.
The Tribunal also indicated that the £1.1m fine imposed by the FSA should be reduced and said a further hearing will be held on this issue.
Herbert Smith partner Martyn Hopper, a former senior member of the FSA’s enforcement team said both parties can claim victory.
"The case proved that L&G was justified in feeling aggrieved but the FSA can claim a sufficient victory because they’ve proved mis-selling," added Hopper.
Hopper then added that the case raises questions about the FSA’s methodology in investigating the mis-selling cases and the size of the sample.
The dispute dates back to the late 1990s, when L&G was alleged to have mis-sold endowment mortgages without highlighting the risk that the investment might not repay the capital element of the loan for which it was intended.
L&G was one of several companies fined for similar offences, though this was the only one to challenge the FSA’s sanction.