Corinne McPartland
Law students have lambasted new plans by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) that will enable students to complete the Legal Practice Course (LPC) in two stages.
Would-be lawyers have labelled the move, which will allow them to study stage two of the LPC at the same time as doing their training contracts as dangerous.
President of Birmingham University law society Chris Snell claimed the initiative would be sure to create a two-tier system.
I think it is aimed more at students who want to work in high street firms rather than the City, said Snell.
He argued that the changes had some major pitfalls - especially when it came to on-the-job training.
If youre learning while you work there might be more of a chance you could make a mistake - especially if you havent finished learning a specific piece of theory, claimed Snell.
Dean of BPP Law School Peter Crisp, which is only offering the new-look LPC part-time, said students would be better off with a sound bedrock of knowledge before they start their training contracts.
Students should be able to hit the ground running as soon as they start their training contract, said Crisp.
The College of Law, the biggest LPC provider in the country is yet to make a final decision on whether to split its course but chief executive Nigel Savage described the changes as potty and claimed they will damage the integrity of the course.
Some students, however, have backed the changes. Andrew Bonsall, president of the University of Leeds law society, said: Its a great idea because it makes the LPC more vocational and gives people more choice - which is always a good thing.
Under the new initiative the first stage of the LPC will cover the core practice areas, course skills and professional responsibilities and conduct. During the second stage students will need to complete three vocational electives.
Trainees who start a training contract after stage one of the LPC can study for their electives entirely in their own time (evening, weekends and/or by distance learning) or be given time off by their employers to study.
Exeter law student Samir Pasha also welcomed the changes but the aspiring barrister does not favour a similar change to the Bar Vocational Course (BVC).
He said: I think it is great for people wanting to be solicitors but I dont think it would be good for the BVC student. Why change something that has been working extremely well for hundreds of years.
Readers' comments (3)
Anonymous | 27-Nov-2008 5:36 pm
New LPC recognises Diversity
As a mature student with work and family commitments, I am currently studying for the GDL part-time by distance learning which is a 2 year programme. I then will have to do the LPC part time by, also distance learning because as a self-funded student much as I would wish, I cannot afford to give up my current full-time employment in order to study full-time.
I would naturally love get into my new chosen career as soon as possible, therefore the option of completing the LPC elective modules whilst on a training contract is of great a appeal for a number of reasons: 1. I can get into a my new career sooner than I anticipated, 2. the vocational experience should help with the electives, 3. I can maintain my financial and family commitments whilst completing my studies, 4. I'll be able to split the cost of the LPC over 2 years.
The Diversity of students is being recognised by the SRA - not every aspiring lawyer is straight out of university with no other commitments in life. I sincerely hope that law firms offering training contracts will embrace these changes.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 28-Nov-2008 12:45 pm
SRA having to justify the time and cost of the review
Surely this is more about the SRA having to justify the lengthy review plus costs of naval gazing at the LPC that was kicked off by the Law Society in response to the City LPC in 2001.
The review is going to mean a lot of ill-prepared students let loose on the public, how is that within the SRA role of protecting the public?
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 28-Nov-2008 4:38 pm
Disaster
I think that it would be a disaster. If you are a trainee in a really busy department, then the chances are that you will be working long hours and will not have the time to devote to the training, whether that be your own time or the firm's. I believe this would be the case whether you work in a City firm or in a small high street practice.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment