The Lawyer Asia Pacific 150 is the only research report to provide a ranking of the top 100 independent local firms and top 50 global firms in the region. The report offers critical review of some of the fastest growing firms and their strategies, a country-by-country guide to leading legal advisers and legal services market trends, plus exclusive insight into the current business development opportunities in the Asia Pacific. Read more
This year, The Lawyer’s annual ranking of the largest UK law firms by turnover is available as an interactive, digital benchmarking tool. For the first time this will allow you to manipulate each data set against the metrics of your choice.
The Law Society council has voted in a secret meeting to ask the profession to choose a range of models for the way multidisciplinary partnerships (MDPs) should be regulated.
The society has so far officially had an 'open mind' on the issue of allowing lawyers to share profits with other professionals. A working group, chaired by Sam Wilson, has been looking at the issue for the past year.
The council voted to allow the policy committee to draw up a consultation paper which will be circulated to all lawyers in England and Wales in September or October.
There are six models for allowing MDPs ranging from the Law Society regulating a firm in which solicitors are the majority owners, to the other extreme of a completely mixed partnership in which only the individual solicitors within the firm are regulated by the Law Society.
The consultation paper will have to wait until after a profession-wide consultation on what to do about the controversial Solicitors Indemnity Fund and its deficit.
Richard Hegarty, a member of the MDP working party, said: 'It's happening anyway some of the big accountancy firms are effectively MDPs already. We don't want to be in a position where we don't control what goes on.'
He said the consultation should be a chance to educate the profession about MDPs.