The Lawyer’s new China Elite report contains the most detailed research available on the PRC legal market and contains unparalleled insight into the country's leading law firms. They vary in size, practice focus and geographic coverage, but they all share one common quality – ambition... Read more
This year, The Lawyer’s annual ranking of the largest UK law firms by turnover is available as an interactive, digital benchmarking tool. For the first time this will allow you to manipulate each data set against the metrics of your choice.
Family lawyers will be asked if they want an accreditation scheme if a draft consultation paper on the issue is approved by the Law Society this week.
The paper, which invites comment from the profession's 20,000 family lawyers, outlines the cases for and against accreditation and suggests ways of implementing it.
Unless it is revised or rejected by the Law Society Council at its meeting on Thursday, the paper will argue in favour of accreditation.
Drawn up by the society's family law committee, the paper says the arguments in favour outweigh those against "provided a measure of consensus can be obtained on the criteria for membership".
Committee chair Hilary Siddle said: "The issue needs to get into the public arena as quickly as possible so the profession can air its views."
Many family lawyers believe accreditation should become an essential feature of family law practice. But it is a controversial issue and some oppose the idea as bureaucratic and interfering.
Nigel Shepherd, chair of the Solicitors Family Law Association, who has been working on the accreditation issue, said: "There is no doubt specialists should be given some kind of recognition for their work. But how they should be assessed is still a matter for debate."