The Lawyer Asia Pacific 150 is the only research report to provide a ranking of the top 100 independent local firms and top 50 global firms in the region. The report offers critical review of some of the fastest growing firms and their strategies, a country-by-country guide to leading legal advisers and legal services market trends, plus exclusive insight into the current business development opportunities in the Asia Pacific. Read more
This year, The Lawyer’s annual ranking of the largest UK law firms by turnover is available as an interactive, digital benchmarking tool. For the first time this will allow you to manipulate each data set against the metrics of your choice.
An overwhelming majority of Council members today (Thursday 16 December) voted to review the Law Society’s position on referral fees.
Following work carried out by the society’s Standards Board on ways to carry out the review, members voted by a majority of 68 votes to nine, with six abstentions, to undertake the review.
Amendments proposed by members Tim Readman and Derek French to completely reinstate the ban with immediate effect were defeated by a two-thirds majority.
The votes mean that the society will now carry out discussions with the profession, clients and other bodies into referral fees and their use.
Today’s decision follows a request from Lord Phillips of Worth Matravers, the Master of the Rolls, that a review be carried out once referral fees had been permitted for a year. The former ban on referral fees was lifted in March this year.
It also comes just months after a postal vote of the profession showed that three-quarters of solicitors are opposed to referral fees. However the Standards Board chair, Andrew Holroyd, refuted suggestions that the review had been prompted by that vote and said it had always been on the board’s agenda.
Many of those who spoke in favour of carrying out a review were against the principle of referral fees, but felt that reviewing the policy was the best way forward.,