The Lawyer Asia Pacific 150 is the only research report to provide a ranking of the top 100 independent local firms and top 50 global firms in the region. The report offers critical review of some of the fastest growing firms and their strategies, a country-by-country guide to leading legal advisers and legal services market trends, plus exclusive insight into the current business development opportunities in the Asia Pacific. Read more
This year, The Lawyer’s annual ranking of the largest UK law firms by turnover is available as an interactive, digital benchmarking tool. For the first time this will allow you to manipulate each data set against the metrics of your choice.
The Bar Council and the Law Society are both splitting their regulatory and complaints-handling functions from their main activities.
At the same time as the Law Society is establishing separate regulatory and complaints-handling bodies, the Bar Council has decided to separate its professional conduct and complaints (PCC) committee from its policy function.
The moves follow recommendations made by Sir David Clementi in his recent report Review of the Regulatory Framework for Legal Services.
Currently, the Law Society and the Bar Council act as the regulatory and representative bodies for the solicitors and barristers professions respectively. Under Clementis proposals, the two functions will be split.
The Law Societys decision to establish separate committees for regulatory and complaints-handling work means that the Law Society Council will now have a solely representative role. Members of the 105-strong council will not be able to serve on both of the new bodies simultaneously.
Over time, the complaints-handling body is expected to cede its functions to the new Clementi-recommended Office for Legal Complaints.
Meanwhile, the Bar Councils move is in response to potential conflicts of interest. At present a barrister can investigate and prosecute for alleged misconduct a fellow member of their profession whom they also sit alongside on Bar Council policymaking committees.
Richard Price QC, chairman of the PCC committee, which is also responsible for the changes, said: "Theres a perception of conflict, rather than an actual conflict. It would be desirable to have people on the PCC committee who are not members of the Bar Councils policymaking department."