When re-litigating a patent may be permitted
In Resolution v Lundbeck, handed down on 12 April 2013, Arnold J has allowed a generic supplier company, Resolution Chemicals Ltd, to pursue its own revocation proceedings against Lundbeck’s SPC/GB02/049 protecting escitalopram, by way of challenge to the validity of its basic patent EP (UK) 0347066.
This is despite the fact that the validity of this patent had already been upheld in earlier litigation, in which one party was a member of the same corporate group as Resolution at the time, and two others belong to the same group as a company that Resolution now has commercial dealings with.
Can a party re-litigate a patent, or will they be estopped because they have a ‘privity of interest’ with a party to the decision of the earlier litigation? In this case, Arnold J has held that a party will be barred from relitigating for privity of interest if it has a “sufficient degree of identification” with the earlier litigants such that it is just to hold that the decision in the earlier case is binding on the re-litigant…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Taylor Wessing briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
Why register to The Lawyer
More relevant to you
News from Taylor Wessing
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Taylor Wessing
For the tax year from 6 April 2014, the standard lifetime allowance has reduced from £1.5m to £1.25m.
One of the areas highlighted last year by the Regulator was the regulation of workplace DC pension schemes.
Analysis from The Lawyer
As the equity capital markets rocketed back into favour and global M&A saw at least a partial return to form, there have been some rich pickings for The Lawyer’s Corporate Team of the Year award shortlisted firms in 2014.
The city-state is working hard to become a global wealth management hub, and law firms are gearing up for a prosperous new world