Warranty or representation — decision over the £16.75m question

The High Court considered whether express warranties in a share purchase agreement could also be representations and therefore found a £16.75m claim for misrepresentation rather than a £6m claim for breach of contract. In this instance the court decided that the express warranties were not representations. Although this is not new law, it is a reminder for sellers and buyers to ensure that drafting reflects the intended allocation of risk. These principles and tactics apply equally to all commercial contracts.

Click on the link above to download this briefing.

Sign in or Register to continue reading this article

Sign in


It's quick, easy and free!

It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.

Register now

Why register to The Lawyer


Industry insight

In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.


Market intelligence

Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.


Email newsletters

Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.

More relevant to you

To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.

Analysis from The Lawyer

View more analysis from The Lawyer


90 High Holborn

Turnover (£m): 117.60
No. of lawyers: 327