Warranty or representation — decision over the £16.75m question
The High Court considered whether express warranties in a share purchase agreement could also be representations and therefore found a £16.75m claim for misrepresentation rather than a £6m claim for breach of contract. In this instance the court decided that the express warranties were not representations. Although this is not new law, it is a reminder for sellers and buyers to ensure that drafting reflects the intended allocation of risk. These principles and tactics apply equally to all commercial contracts.
Click on the link above to download this briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
Why register to The Lawyer
More relevant to you
News from The Lawyer
Analysis from The Lawyer
At the time of its launch Accutrainee was described as a revolutionary change to the training model. Has it proved to be so? Not really.
The culture of compliance that pervaded regulation in the past is giving way to a fresh principles-based approach