Validity of post-acquisition restrictive covenants
In the recent case of Cavendish Square Holdings BV and another v BV Makdessi (2012) the court held that restrictive covenants which had the effect of lasting eight-and-a-half years following completion of a share purchase agreement were not an unreasonable restraint of trade and assessed the validity of penalty clauses by reference to the commercial justification test.
The target company (Team Y&R Holdings Hong Kong Ltd) was a large advertising and marketing communications group in the Middle East. The sellers were two individuals (‘M’ and ‘G’), leading business personalities who had built strong personal relationships with their clients. The Claimant (‘Cavendish’) owned 12.6% of the company and in 2008 agreed to purchase a further 47.4% of the shares. The share purchase agreement (‘SPA’) provided for payment of initial consideration and two tranches of deferred consideration, which would not be paid under certain circumstances.
In 2010 Cavendish discovered that M had acted in breach of his duties to the company as a director and in breach of his obligations under the restrictive covenants of the SPA by continuing to be involved and interested in a competitor company…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Goodman Derrick briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
Click on the link above to download this briefing from Goodman Derrick.
News from Goodman Derrick
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Goodman Derrick
Supreme Court dismisses police appeal and refuses to allow secret evidence in application for production order against Sky News
R (on the application of British Sky Broadcasting Ltd) v The Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis involves conflicting areas of public interest.
Opinion that employee not disabled under Equality Act does not give employer defence for not making reasonable adjustments
Employers have a duty to make reasonable adjustments for disabled employees. However, this duty only arises where the employer knows the employee is suffering from a qualifying disability.
Analysis from The Lawyer
You don’t have to be a big firm to innovate and thrive in a downturn, as our look at the lower half of the UK 200 shows. We pick 10 inspiring stories
Our latest in-depth analysis of UK M&A legal bills reveals a good performance by smaller firms and success fees on the rise