The concept of proportionality is not new to litigation
On 1 April 2013, there will be a cultural shift in the civil litigation landscape, mostly arising out of recommendations made by Lord Justice Jackson. The reforms herald major changes to how costs are dealt with by the courts. In particular, there will be greater emphasis on proportionality.
The overriding objective (CPR 1.1), which underpins civil litigation, has been amended to say that cases are to be dealt with justly and ‘at proportionate cost’. Including the concept of proportionality within the overriding objective places the principle at the very core of litigation practice.
Whether or not a step is proportionate must be considered in every case and at every stage as the matter progresses. In addition to the overriding objective, a new test of proportionality has been introduced when assessing costs. The intention in doing so is that there will be a greater focus on how litigation costs are managed, which should result in cases being conducted more economically and efficiently…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Shoosmiths briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Shoosmiths
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Shoosmiths
The recent IBM judgment provides a reminder to employers to stick to their core values or face potential claims that they have breached the implied duty of trust and confidence.
Shoosmiths’ Kath Livingston, who joined 36,000 others pounding the streets in the London Marathon on Sunday, ponders whether litigation is a marathon or a sprint.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Compliance and corporate governance codes for large financial institutions will undoubtedly include provisions to regulate high pay in the future
There’s more to the ABS model than attracting the man in the street and procuring external investment. Partners at the big corporate firms, take note…