Surprise as court allows claim to recover losses above FOS ruling
The High Court has held that individuals who have had a complaint determined by the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS), and who have accepted the determination of the FOS in their favour, are not prevented from bringing a subsequent court claim to recover damages in excess of the FOS’s ruling.
This surprising decision in Clark v In Focus Asset Management & Tax Solutions Ltd may well be appealed, and certainly Court of Appeal guidance on this question is now required. It had been thought, following Andrews v SBJ Benefit Consultants, that where a claimant accepts a final determination from the FOS this would preclude a court claim in relation to the same matter. The point is relevant to high value claims because the FOS can award a maximum of £150,000 and merely recommend the respondent firm pay the balance.
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Walker Morris briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Walker Morris
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Walker Morris
The High Court has considered whether a claimant waived privilege in confidential documents simply because they had been seen by someone other than the claimant and his lawyer.
The FCA has published the above consultation paper, which sets out its intended approach to the implementation of a price cap for high-cost, short-term credit.
Analysis from The Lawyer
The law school war shows no signs of ending. But we have, perhaps, reached the end of the beginning.
New EU rules and lawyers’ increased comfort with digital formats are sparking a sea-change in the way law firms manage their documents