Supreme Court confirms legal advice privilege extends only to legal profession
The Supreme Court has recently delivered an important decision on the question of whether legal advice privilege covers communications between a client and a non-lawyer. By a 5:2 majority, their Lordships held that the privilege extends only to advice given by members of the legal profession. Consequently, documents relating to a tax law advice given in this case by chartered accountants had to be disclosed to the UK tax authorities.
Where it applies, privilege protects a party from having to disclose its communications. There are two types of privilege: legal advice privilege and litigation privilege. The Prudential judgment is concerned with legal advice privilege alone.
Legal advice privilege protects all communications passing between a client and its lawyers in connection with the provision of legal advice except in very limited circumstances…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Ince & Co briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
Why register to The Lawyer
More relevant to you
News from Ince & Co
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Ince & Co
B Atlantic provides a good example of the courts’ approach to construing exclusions (with perhaps surprising outcomes) and in assessing whether a foreign court has acted perversely or by reason of political interference.
The ECJ has confirmed that the Brussels Regulation does not prevent a EU member state court from recognising and enforcing an anti-suit injunction granted by arbitrators.