Supreme Court advocates good sport
In a case that will concern sporting fans and those working in data-sensitive industries, the Supreme Court has recently upheld a Court of Appeal decision requiring a ticket sales website to disclose to the Rugby Football Union details of people who had advertised or sold rugby match tickets through the site. The RFU required the Norwich Pharmacal order to facilitate its crackdown on the resale of tickets or the sale of tickets at above face value.
In The Rugby Football Union (Respondent) v Consolidated Information Services Limited (formerly Viagogo Limited) (In Liquidation) (Appellant) the Supreme Court gave a unanimous judgment which provides useful guidance, against the background of interesting facts, as to the circumstances in which Norwich Pharmacal disclosure orders will be granted…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Walker Morris briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Walker Morris
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Walker Morris
What do you do when you take possession of a house and the former occupier has left various items of theirs behind?
Equity of exoneration — joint mortgagors do not necessarily have joint responsibility for the secured debt
It is a not uncommon situation — the family home is jointly mortgaged to secure the debts of a family member’s business.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Which firms are cutting it in this era of slimline rosters, and who are the GC new brooms making clean sweeps? The Lawyer can reveal all
The law school war shows no signs of ending. But we have, perhaps, reached the end of the beginning.