Samsung v Apple: English High Court decision — three Samsung patents invalid
Mr Justice Floyd has given two judgments in the case of Samsung Electronics v Apple Retail UK and others, concerning three patents owned by Samsung that were alleged to be infringed by Apple’s 3G devices, including models of iPhone and iPad. Mr Justice Floyd found all three Samsung patents to be invalid on the basis that they were not entitled to the priority dates claimed.
Click on the link above to download the briefing from Taylor Wessing.
News from Taylor Wessing
Taylor Wessing advises Mediaquest on acquisition of two business websites
Taylor Wessing advises iCITY and Infinity in landmark Olympic legacy deal
Taylor Wessing's GIPI team introduces intellectual property survey
Taylor Wessing appoints Sanjvee Shah to its private client practice
Mark Owen joins Taylor Wessing's international TMT group
News from The Lawyer
FFW snares longstanding Taylor Wessing partner in three-lawyer swoop
Taylor Wessing to put 96 secretarial roles in redundancy consultation
First batch of financials spin promising story for UK firms
Taylor Wessing revenue rises 7 per cent following international add-ons
Speechly Bircham and Withers merger vote just days away
Briefings from Taylor Wessing
Social media in the pharmaceutical sector
A recent survey of sales and marketing executives at large pharmaceutical companies shows that one in four interactions with doctors, healthcare providers and patients in the US is now digital.
The new technology transfer block exemption
The existing technology transfer block exemption is to expire on 30 April 2014. It will be replaced by a new regulation, the period of consultation for which ended on 17 May 2013.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Crunch boom
Financial disputes are starting to dominate the English courts as the long-awaited fallout from the downturn finally comes to town
Patent by numbers
A single patent court system for Europe and the high-profile ‘phone wars’ are putting IP at the heart of clients’ business strategies
