Residential occupier tests
Under section 106 of the Construction Act 1996, parties to a construction contract have a right to refer a dispute to adjudication. However, this right does not exist in the case of a ‘residential occupier’. The recent case of Westfields Construction Ltd v Lewis  EWHC 376 (TCC) is valuable in that the High Court has set out the key parameters of the so-called ‘residential occupier test’ and should thus operate as useful guidance to parties unsure of whether a current or potential dispute is suitable for adjudication.
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Walker Morris briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Walker Morris
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Walker Morris
Intellectual property disputes involving retailers and fashion are all too common; another one to have troubled the courts in recent months is Thomas Pink v Victoria’s Secret UK.
In Biscuits Poult SAS v OHIM, the applicant for invalidity challenged the registration on the basis that the design in question was not new and lacked individual character.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Which firms are cutting it in this era of slimline rosters, and who are the GC new brooms making clean sweeps? The Lawyer can reveal all
The law school war shows no signs of ending. But we have, perhaps, reached the end of the beginning.