International Top 30 position: 16

Rebate schemes and discount practices by dominant companies under EU competition law

The European Court of Justice recently handed down a significant decision holding that the Tomra Group had abused its dominant position through the use of exclusionary strategies in the European Economic Area. The judgment follows the General Court and ECJ’s traditional formalistic, or ‘per se’, approach, which generally treats rebate schemes implemented by dominant entities as anti-competitive. The ECJ’s decision is in tension with the effects-based approach to abuses of dominance championed by the European Commission’s 2009 Guidelines.

Click on the link above to download this Dechert briefing.

Sign in or Register to continue reading this article

Sign in


It's quick, easy and free!

It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.

Register now

Why register to The Lawyer


Industry insight

In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.


Market intelligence

Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.


Email newsletters

Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.

More relevant to you

To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.

Briefings from Dechert

View more briefings from Dechert

Analysis from The Lawyer

View more analysis from The Lawyer

Browse This Firm’s


160 Queen Victoria St

Global turnover 2012: $729m
Global lawyers 2011: 748