Hotel Cipriani succeeds in latest round of trademark litigation
In December 2008 the High Court gave judgment for the Hotel Cipriani in Venice, owned by Orient-Express Hotels Limited, in its claim for trade mark infringement and passing off in respect of the CIPRIANI mark for restaurant services, against the operators of the CIPRIANI LONDON restaurant. The High Court also granted an injunction to prohibit infringement of the CIPRIANI mark, passing off any restaurant business not connected with the Hotel Cipriani by use of the name “Cipriani” as well as the use of the mark CIPRIANI or any other mark which was confusingly similar to CIPRIANI in relation to restaurant services.
The defendants’ appeal against that judgment was dismissed by the Court of Appeal in February 2010. The defendants included Giuseppe Cipriani (Giuseppe) and a company of which he was a director, Cipriani (Grosvenor) Ltd. That company had subsequently changed its name to Fred 250 Ltd (Fred 250).
Fred 250 dropped the name Cipriani from its two London restaurants, C London and Downtown Mayfair. The logo of the first said “Managed by Giuseppe Cipriani”; the logo of the second said “by G. Cipriani”…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Walker Morris briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Walker Morris
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Walker Morris
Also: £90k fine for nominated adviser; ’proper purpose’ for inspecting a register of members; and more.
Some interesting recent Technology and Construction Court cases that provide clarification on adjudication procedures and rules.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Which firms are cutting it in this era of slimline rosters, and who are the GC new brooms making clean sweeps? The Lawyer can reveal all
The law school war shows no signs of ending. But we have, perhaps, reached the end of the beginning.