FOS award no longer end of the road for claimants
In late December 2012, the High Court heard the appeal in Clark v In Focus Asset Management and Tax Solutions Limited. The case concerned financial advice given to the appellants regarding the sale of their business and business premises in 2001 and 2004 respectively, which caused them substantial loss. They complained to the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) and their complaint was upheld, with a final award of £100,000.
This was accepted by the appellants, subject to the words ‘we reserve the right to pursue the matter further through the civil court’. The appellants subsequently issued court proceedings for the balance of their loss. The respondent applied to strike out the claim on the basis that the FOS award had been accepted and accordingly the court had no jurisdiction to entertain the claim. The application to strike out was granted…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Shoosmiths briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Shoosmiths
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Shoosmiths
The Court of Appeal has found in favour of a business tenant and decided that a periodic tenancy had not been created in the intervening period.
Careful drafting is usually required for restrictive covenants to be enforceable, although Prophet plc v Huggett provides the exception to the rule.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Compliance and corporate governance codes for large financial institutions will undoubtedly include provisions to regulate high pay in the future
There’s more to the ABS model than attracting the man in the street and procuring external investment. Partners at the big corporate firms, take note…