Exit consents unlawful under English law
On 27 July 2012, the Chancery Division of the English High Court upheld a challenge to the legality of an exit consent on the basis that it was oppressive towards the minority bondholders and at variance with the purposes for which majorities in a class are given power to bind minorities. The court also upheld a separate claim that the use of the exit consent in issue was caught by a prohibition in the applicable trust deed against the issuer voting bonds beneficially held by it or for its own account.
Click on the link above to download this Davis Polk & Wardwell briefing.
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Davis Polk & Wardwell
A panel of three judges in the DC Circuit stunned Washington on Friday by striking down President Obama’s recess appointments to the NLRB in Noel Canning v NLRB on a basis much more sweeping than had been anticipated.
Looking back at 2012, four years after China implemented its Anti-Monopoly Law, we can discern some important ways in which China’s antitrust regime today both mirrors and departs from antitrust regimes in other jurisdictions to which our clients are subject.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Hong Kong IPO activity is hotting up again, but UK legal stalwarts are looking over their shoulders as US rivals make up ground fast