Exemptions for EU substance restrictions in electrical and electronic equipment
Electrical and electronic equipment (EEE) often contains hazardous substances, such as lead, cadmium or mercury. These hazardous substances can create significant environmental and health problems when waste EEE is being disposed of or recycled. For these reasons the amount and type of substances which can be included into EEE is restricted.
The EU Directive on the Restriction of Hazardous Substances (RoHS) (2002/95/EC) was adopted by the EU on 1 July 2006 and restricts the use of certain hazardous substances in EEE put on the market after this date. The RoHS Directive was reviewed in 2010, which led to its repeal and replacement by a new Directive from 3 January 2013 (2011/65/EU).
The RoHS 2 Directive is transposed into UK law by the Restriction of the Use of Certain Hazardous Substances in Electrical and Electronic Equipment Regulations 2012, which came into force on 2 January 2013. The RoHS Regulations 2012 continue to place restrictions on the use of certain hazardous substances in EEE and are relevant to manufacturers selling a wide range of EEE in the EU…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the DLA Piper briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from DLA Piper
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from DLA Piper
This is an Australian-specific alternative chapter on data protection, which was designed to assist organisations operating in Australia with their new privacy responsibilities.
Health Alert — Lane v Northern NSW Local Health District (No 3); Psychology Board of Australia v Tubara; and more
DLA Piper has released the 28 July 2014 issue of its Health Alert, which focuses on judgments, legislation and reports in the health sector.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Shearman & Sterling is making its presence felt in the City, squaring up to magic circle firms and looking to muscle in on key relationships. Private equity house Bridgepoint is one outfit that has had its head turned by the US firm.
A new breed of lawyer is smoothing the path for companies entering emerging or unstable jurisdictions