Cargo: when is a 'clean bill' not clean?
Cargo interests brought a claim under the bills of lading in relation to a heavily rusted cargo of steel pipes. The pipes were in fact rusty on shipment, but the bills of lading contained a standard form RETLA clause (named after the US case, Tokio Marine & Fire Insurance v. Retla Shipping), on which the owners sought to rely in order to defeat the claim. The RETLA clause sometimes appears on the face of a bill of lading where the carriage involves iron, steel, metal products or timber. The aim of the clause is to qualify the term “apparent good order and condition” by clarifying that, when the cargo was received for shipment, it was not necessarily free of visible rust or moisture, staining, chaffing etc.
Click on the link above to download briefing.
News from Ince & Co
Martin David joins Ince & Co's Singapore office as Asia head of energy
Ince & Co promotes three new partners
Ince & Co seminar focuses on key issues in Indian shipping
Lawyer rating publication recognises Ince & Co's Super Lawyers and Rising Stars
Ince & Co achieves top rankings in Chambers Global 2013 edition
Briefings from Ince & Co
Legal update: international trade and commodities — April 2013
Ince & Co has published the April 2013 edition of its International Trade and Commodities Legal Update.
The Astra: single hire default entitles owners to withdraw and claim loss of profit for remaining charter period
A Commercial Court judge has decided that a failure to pay hire under an NYPE charterparty amounts to a breach of condition, entitling a ship-owner to terminate and seek damages.
Analysis from The Lawyer

Cover up
Professional indemnity cases keep hitting the court lists as settlement values continue to rise

