Breach of trust — all or nothing?
The Court of Appeal recently handed down judgment in AIB v Mark Redler & Co. The case dealt with two main issues: when does a solicitor have authority to release the advance in a remortgage transaction?; and if the solicitor does act in breach of trust, what is the correct remedy?
AIB lent £3.3 million to the borrowers by way of remortgage. In error, Mark Redler & Co, a firm of solicitors, acting for the borrowers and AIB, paid only £1.2 million to Barclays to redeem its charge, leaving £273,000 outstanding (the balance went to the borrowers). Barclays refused to release its charge so the claimant, AIB, did not get the first charge over the property it had expected. The borrowers defaulted and the property was sold, realising £1.2 million, leaving AIB, as second chargeholder, out of pocket by around £3 million. AIB sued the solicitors, not just for the sum paid to the borrowers by mistake, but for the whole of its advance, alleging that the solicitors had acted in breach of trust…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Walker Morris briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
Why register to The Lawyer
More relevant to you
News from Walker Morris
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Walker Morris
When a housing association sought possession against a tenant with severe mental health problems…
The aim of the directive is to ensure that consumers who purchase a property are protected against the risks. It also introduces EU harmonisation requirements on lenders.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Which firms are cutting it in this era of slimline rosters, and who are the GC new brooms making clean sweeps? The Lawyer can reveal all
The law school war shows no signs of ending. But we have, perhaps, reached the end of the beginning.