Back-to-back confidentiality agreements
It is often said that confidentiality clauses have no teeth. Frequently agreed, but then difficult to enforce. It can be tricky to show a breach and, even then, what loss has been caused? Perhaps that is why they are rarely tested in court. A recent Court of Appeal decision (Dorchester v BNP Paribas, 7 March 2013), though, is a reminder that such agreements are contracts to be enforced like any other. They can have some Draconian effects, particularly where a party agrees to procure confidentiality from any third party to whom they pass on the confidential information.
The dispute in Dorchester related to a property deal. Dorchester disclosed to BNP confidential information about a development opportunity which BNP could then disclose to IKEA, a potential funder. BNP signed a “non-disclosure and non-circumvention deed” with Dorchester, the effect of which was that BNP agreed to procure that any party receiving confidential information was bound by similar non-disclosure and non-circumvention obligations…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Taylor Wessing briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Taylor Wessing
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Taylor Wessing
On 5 December 2013, the Court of Justice of the European Union published its decision on the appeal of the European Medicines Agency.
The Court of Justice of the European Union has released a ‘reasoned order’ in the GSK Biologicals SA case (C-210/13).
Analysis from The Lawyer
The city-state is working hard to become a global wealth management hub, and law firms are gearing up for a prosperous new world
Financial disputes are starting to dominate the English courts as the long-awaited fallout from the downturn finally comes to town