Arbitration in Australia: an arbitrator’s right to be wrong
The High Court of Australia has handed down its judgment in TCL Air Conditioner (Zhongshan) Co Ltd v The Judges of the Federal Court of Australia [2013] HCA 5. The court upheld the procedure for enforcing an arbitral award under Australian legislation, which is largely equivalent to that under the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration. It also upheld the constitutional validity of the limited grounds for allowing a party to resist enforcement of an arbitral award under the Model Law.
Click on the link above to download the briefing from King & Wood Mallesons.
News from King & Wood Mallesons
King & Wood Mallesons advises GE Capital's real-estate arm on portfolio sale
King and Wood Mallesons acts on launch of Virtus Health’s AU$339m raising
Firms work together to develop best practice approach to drafting security documents
KWM advises EnergyAustralia on proposed divestment of wind farm shares
KWM advises Charter Hall on strategic real-estate acquisition
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from King & Wood Mallesons
PPSA model clauses for a general security agreement
Since before the operational commencement of the PPSA 2009 (Cth) in January 2012, and certainly since then, law firms have been settling their position on the many issues it raises.
China Bulletin — April 2013
The April 2013 issue of King & Wood Mallesons’ China Bulletin is available now.
