Arbitration award to be set aside? Tribunal’s conduct has to be serious or egregious
Certainty of arbitration has been preserved in Hong Kong. The Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal recently ended the challenge to the Court of Appeal’s reinstatement of an ICC arbitration award, which had been set aside at first instance for want of due process. The Court of Appeal’s decision in this case authoritatively sets out the test for setting aside an award.
The decision of the Court of Appeal in Pacific China Holdings Limited (In Liquidation) v Grand Pacific Holdings Limited sets out the test for when an arbitration award can be set aside for want of due process under the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration (Article 34(2)(a)(ii) or (iv)).
The tribunal’s conduct has to be serious or egregious before the court will invoke its power to set aside the award for want of due process…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the King & Wood Mallesons briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from King & Wood Mallesons
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from King & Wood Mallesons
High Court decides: liquidators of insolvent landlords can disclaim leases with the effect of extinguishing the tenant’s leasehold interest
In Willmott Growers Group Inc v Willmott Forests Limited, the majority of the High Court upheld the Victorian Court of Appeal’s conclusion that the liquidators of an insolvent landlord can disclaim a lease.
Queensland recently brought an interlocutory application seeking a declaration that its laws were valid until a court finally determined otherwise.
Analysis from The Lawyer
All-encompassing change is now a reality for the UK’s top 200 firms. How are they coping with the unprecedented upheaval? The Lawyer finds out