A perfect storm for exemplary damages
As the first case in which the Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) has awarded ‘follow-on’ damages under section 47A of the Competition Act 1998, it is unsurprising that the case of 2 Travel Group plc (in Liquidation) v Cardiff City Transport Services Ltd has been widely reported.
Most commentators have identified two main themes; first, that a precedent of awarding damages in a follow-on action has been set, which should encourage future follow-on claims (especially given the government’s current proposals to facilitate further private actions); and secondly, that exemplary damages can be awarded for breaches of competition law. The case has been analysed to gain an insight as to how future follow-on actions will fare, and also to consider if awards of exemplary damages will become a feature of such actions.
Addleshaw Goddard acted for the claimant and while, of course, the case was decided on its facts, the claim was perhaps more nuanced than has been reported and gave rise to numerous broader issues of general importance to such follow-on claims. This article seeks to highlight those issues…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Addleshaw Goddard briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
Why register to The Lawyer
More relevant to you
News from The Lawyer
Analysis from The Lawyer
Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer has made waves in Manchester by offering the city’s paralegals turbocharged salaries to switch allegiances.
Which firms are cutting it in this era of slimline rosters, and who are the GC new brooms making clean sweeps? The Lawyer can reveal all