The Lawyer Asia Pacific 150 is the only research report to provide a ranking of the top 100 independent local firms and top 50 global firms in the region. The report offers critical review of some of the fastest growing firms and their strategies, a country-by-country guide to leading legal advisers and legal services market trends, plus exclusive insight into the current business development opportunities in the Asia Pacific. Read more
This year, The Lawyer’s annual ranking of the largest UK law firms by turnover is available as an interactive, digital benchmarking tool. For the first time this will allow you to manipulate each data set against the metrics of your choice.
Lawyers acting for John Norton, who last week took the Home Office to the High Court over its decision to end the early release of prisoners under the 1967 Criminal Justice Act, are still waiting for the court to give its reasons for finding against him.
The Divisional Court rejected Norton's application for judicial review last Thursday. But Sheffield-based firm John Howell & Co, which is representing him, has announced it will appeal regardless of the Divisional Court's reasons.
Partner Danny Simpson said: "It is simply unfair. A week ago John was serving his sentence and knew what his release date was. Then he was told he would be released early, and other prisoners on his wing were already being released. Now, all of a sudden, the Home Office says his release is suspended."
He added: "What John is complaining about is the capricious way he has been treated. No one has a problem if they know what the rules are."
Simpson believes the Home Office has unintentionally masterminded "the biggest jailbreak in British history".
But not all lawyers believe Home Secretary Michael Howard is in the wrong. Liverpool defence lawyer Rex Makin said: "I truly believe that over the last two years Howard has earned the title of 'Prince of Darkness', but on this occasion, much as it pains me to say so, he has made the right decision."