The Lawyer Asia Pacific 150 is the only research report to provide a ranking of the top 100 independent local firms and top 50 global firms in the region. The report offers critical review of some of the fastest growing firms and their strategies, a country-by-country guide to leading legal advisers and legal services market trends, plus exclusive insight into the current business development opportunities in the Asia Pacific. Read more
This year, The Lawyer’s annual ranking of the largest UK law firms by turnover is available as an interactive, digital benchmarking tool. For the first time this will allow you to manipulate each data set against the metrics of your choice.
The Law Commission’s attitude to the enforcement of pre-nuptial agreements has been slammed by family lawyers’ association Resolution for its lack of urgency.
Resolution believes that by refusing to discuss whether pre-nuptial agreements should be legally enforceable, the commission is stalling a wider examination of divorce laws, which have not been revamped since 1973.
The commission will not create a draft parliamentary bill on the issue - which would bring the system in England and Wales in line with that in Scotland - until 2012. Dawsons partner Suzanne Kingston, a member of Resolution’s board, told The Lawyer: “The Law Commission’s recommendations could change the face of divorce in England and Wales. I am, however, disappointed that we must wait until 2012 before the review is concluded. It’s also of concern that pending the review the law may develop by way of ad hoc case law rather than statutory reform.”
Kingston’s concerns were echoed by Mishcon de Reya head of family Sandra Davis, who said that existing divorce laws were flawed and have so far been defined by judges rather than the Government.
Withers partner Mark Harper said the need for divorce law reform was long overdue, adding that as they stand the proposed reforms are not broad enough.
Harper said he was particularly disappointed that the commission had refused to reform Section 25 of the Matrimonial Causes Act, which lays down basic guidelines for the settlement of matrimonial assets and financial matters.
“It effectively means the courts will continue to be clogged by wealthy people who want to litigate on points of law,” Harper said.