The Lawyer’s new China Elite report contains the most detailed research available on the PRC legal market and contains unparalleled insight into the country's leading law firms. They vary in size, practice focus and geographic coverage, but they all share one common quality – ambition... Read more
This year, The Lawyer’s annual ranking of the largest UK law firms by turnover is available as an interactive, digital benchmarking tool. For the first time this will allow you to manipulate each data set against the metrics of your choice.
THE Legal Action Group (LAG) has stepped up its campaign to stop the Government changing the format of social security tribunals, by issuing a briefing letter to 60 House of Lords peers.
The Lords will discuss the Social Security Bill on 30 March.
The LAG and other groups, including the Law Society and the Council on Tribunals, are opposed to the Bill's proposal to replace the existing three-person tribunals chaired by a legally-qualified person with non legally-qualified tribunals of between one and three members from a panel.
The LAG briefing labels the change "significant" and "retrograde" and claims the lack of qualified tribunal members will result in mistakes being made, causing delay and expense.
Head of policy at the LAG, Vicki Chapman, said: "Appellants in social security cases are frequently unrepresented and often hopelessly at sea when a legal problem arises. Many have poor literacy skills, ill health or mental health problems."
Chapman added that three-person tribunals guarded against prejudice.