The Lawyer’s new China Elite report contains the most detailed research available on the PRC legal market and contains unparalleled insight into the country's leading law firms. They vary in size, practice focus and geographic coverage, but they all share one common quality – ambition... Read more
This year, The Lawyer’s annual ranking of the largest UK law firms by turnover is available as an interactive, digital benchmarking tool. For the first time this will allow you to manipulate each data set against the metrics of your choice.
LORD Woolf has been accused by the Legal Action Group of making a deliberate political decision to "play down" the Government's policy of increasing court fees.
The LAG describes the planned fees hike as objectionable and constitutionally suspect. It says Woolf made an implicit political decision to duck an issue likely "to provide an additional barrier to justice for poor people".
The accusation appears in a detailed briefing paper provided by the pressure group for its one-day civil justice conference last Saturday.
The group praises Woolf for "a deliberate and thoughtful intervention" into the debate on civil justice reform. But it says the report is biased in favour of existing litigants when "those who receive least justice in society are those who have no access to the remedy available to meet the wrong they face".
The group adds that the report's scope is limited by its lack of research facilities and a concentration on High Court procedures at the expense of County Courts.
It also warns of the dangers of mediation being used by the Government as an excuse to cut legal aid spending.