The Lawyer’s new China Elite report contains the most detailed research available on the PRC legal market and contains unparalleled insight into the country's leading law firms. They vary in size, practice focus and geographic coverage, but they all share one common quality – ambition... Read more
This year, The Lawyer’s annual ranking of the largest UK law firms by turnover is available as an interactive, digital benchmarking tool. For the first time this will allow you to manipulate each data set against the metrics of your choice.
A lack of court resources was hindering access to justice, according to a survey of solicitors published last week. Nearly four out of 10 solicitors responding to a Law Society survey said that inefficient administration in court offices made an appreciable impact on their clients' cases.
This year's Woolf Questionnaire, dealing with the impact of the Civil Procedure Rules introduced back in 1999, was sent out to 200 solicitors asking about the effectiveness of civil justice reforms. It found the court system was being hampered by delays, lost files, late notification of trial dates, trial bundles not being updated and a failure to answer phones.
"There's a real danger of the Woolf civil justice reforms being undermined by a lack of funding," commented Janet Paraskeva, Law Society chief executive. "Solicitors are telling us that problems created by underfunding are increasing costs. Inevitably, this will have serious consequences for people on low incomes and could impede their ability to seek justice."
A third of respondents claimed to have had clients who had been discouraged from pursuing claims because of high court costs.