The Lawyer Asia Pacific 150 is the only research report to provide a ranking of the top 100 independent local firms and top 50 global firms in the region. The report offers critical review of some of the fastest growing firms and their strategies, a country-by-country guide to leading legal advisers and legal services market trends, plus exclusive insight into the current business development opportunities in the Asia Pacific. Read more
This year, The Lawyer’s annual ranking of the largest UK law firms by turnover is available as an interactive, digital benchmarking tool. For the first time this will allow you to manipulate each data set against the metrics of your choice.
LIZ DAVIES, the left-wing Labour councillor and barrister who was rejected as a parliamentary candidate by the Labour Party's National Executive Committee (NEC) last September, has accepted an undisclosed but "modest" libel payout along with a public apology from the Financial Times.
Solicitor Keith Schilling, acting for Davies, told Mr Justice French that Davies, an Islington councillor, believed that a Financial Times report of her rejection published last September and which included quotes from Tom Sawyer, Labour Party General Secretary, may have led readers to believe that she had incited political activists to violence.
He said the paper had since published a letter from Davies saying that the only adverse material before the NEC on the issue had been in the form of letters from three Islington councillors.
Schilling said the defendants had at no time alleged that the NEC made any finding against Davies on the issue, nor had they intended to suggest that she had ever incited political activists to violence.
In the circumstances, she had been content to accept a "modest payment" to bring the proceedings to a close, he said.
Davies, who is a housing specialist at Mitre House Chambers, is pursuing a second libel case against the three Islington councillors, one of whom has now left the council.
She added that she is no longer seeking nomination as an MP. "The ruling of the NEC was not about the de selection procedure, it was about my politics," she said. "And in those circumstances it is quite clear to everyone concerned that if I stood again they would refuse to endorse me."