The Lawyer Asia Pacific 150 is the only research report to provide a ranking of the top 100 independent local firms and top 50 global firms in the region. The report offers critical review of some of the fastest growing firms and their strategies, a country-by-country guide to leading legal advisers and legal services market trends, plus exclusive insight into the current business development opportunities in the Asia Pacific. Read more
This year, The Lawyer’s annual ranking of the largest UK law firms by turnover is available as an interactive, digital benchmarking tool. For the first time this will allow you to manipulate each data set against the metrics of your choice.
Kirkland & Ellis is being sued for malpractice by former patent client Magnetek. The move comes after the US firm lost a patent case on behalf of the electronics company.
The case, which was filed in the Circuit Court of Cook County, relates to a 1998 litigation between Magnetek and Ole K Nilssen, who owns a large number of US patents relating mostly to electronic lighting products, and Geo Foundation.
After arbitration, the longstanding patent dispute settled in favour of Nilssen and Geo earlier this year. Magnetek was ordered to pay Nilssen and Geo $22m (£11.80m).
However, Magnetek claims that Kirkand failed to uncover information relating to a previous Nilssen case that could have invalidated the Nilssen patent that the dispute centred on.
It is alleged that Magnetek discovered the evidence without the aid of Kirkland.
Magnetek has instructed Katten & Temple partner Mitchell Katten and Martin Washton of Towle Denison Smith & Tavera.
Kirkland declined to comment. At this stage it is not clear whether the firm has instructed anyone in relation to the case.